ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Safety and efficacy of MCO-010 optogenetic therapy in patients with Stargardt disease in USA (STARLIGHT): an open-label multi-center Ph2 trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05417126 (A Phase 2a, Open Label Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effects of a Single Intravitreal Injection of vMCO-010 Optogenetic Therapy in Subjects With Stargardt Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2a, Open Label Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effects of a Single Intravitreal Injection of vMCO-010 Optogenetic Therapy in Subjects With Stargardt Disease
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- From optical control to translational readiness: an evidence-tiered framework for optogenetics in neuromuscular and neurological disorders.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Optogenetic vision restoration: translational barriers and emerging therapeutic strategies.Gene therapy · 2026Review
- Update on the Management of ABCA4 Retinopathy (Stargardt Disease).Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Modalities of vision restoration in optic neuropathies and retinal disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Efficacy of Multi-Characteristic Opsin Gene Therapy in a Mouse Model of Stargardt Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Precision Medicine in Inherited Retinal Disease: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Stargardt Disease Presenting as Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Case of Monoallelic ABCA4-Associated Retinopathy.Cureus · 2026Article
- Review
- Quantum Computing and Quantum Technologies in Drug Discovery and Therapeutics: Evidence, Benchmarking, and Translational Integration.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Advantages of human opsins in optogenetic visual restoration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stargardt disease (SD) is an inherited degenerative retinal disease affecting rod and cone photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, leading to severe and irreversible vision loss. Optogenetics is a promising approach to restoring vision by photosensitizing spared healthy retinal neurons. Methods: The STARLIGHT phase 2 open-label study (NCT05417126) was conducted over 48-weeks at two US sites to assess the safety and efficacy of MCO-010 administered via a single intravitreal injection in the worse-seeing eye of SD patients. The study began on July 5, 2022, and was completed on September 28, 2023. MCO-010 targets bipolar cells rather than retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to utilize more abundant cells that respond to ambient light while preserving natural visual processing pathways after treatment. Six adults (mean age 50 years, range 32-71 years, four males and two females) received 1.2E11 genome copies (gc)/eye of MCO-010. The primary outcome was the incidence, nature, severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), intraocular inflammation, retinal thickness, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and lesion size. Secondary endpoints included change in BCVA, vision-guided mobility, and shape determination accuracy. Visual field perimetry and Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire (MRDQ) were exploratory endpoints. Findings: All six participants had at least one ocular TEAE; non-ocular TEAEs occurred in three participants. The most common TEAEs were conjunctival hemorrhage, ocular hypertension, and vitreous cells (two subjects). There were no deaths, hospitalization, loss of eye, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation. The BCVA (mean ± SD) of the six treated eyes at baseline and 48-week follow-up was 22.8 ± 9.87 (range 9-35), and 28.3 ± 13.28 (range 4-42) ETDRS letters, respectively. The BCVA change from baseline was 7.2 ± 11.74, 4.2 ± 14.81, and 5.5 ± 12.29 at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively. With a wearable magnifier (low-vision glasses), the BCVA change was 17.8 ± 13.35, 15.7 ± 17.37, 13.3 ± 21.37 at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively. The improvement in mean defect in visual field perimetry was 1.02 ± 3.54, 2.47 ± 5.00, and 2.63 ± 5.26 dB at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively. Specific improvements were noted in reading, and color, and contrast domains of the MRDQ. Interpretation: MCO-010 optogenetic phase 2 results support further investigation for treatment SD. To our knowledge, this is the first report of improving on(eye)-chart vision of SD participants utilizing optogenetics. Funding: Nanoscope Therapeutics Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.