ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Impact of treatment suspension on health-related quality of life in the EMBARK trial: a post hoc analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02319837 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of Enzalutamide Plus Leuprolide, Enzalutamide Monotherapy, and Placebo Plus Leuprolide in Men With High-Risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Progressing After Definitive Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of Enzalutamide Plus Leuprolide, Enzalutamide Monotherapy, and Placebo Plus Leuprolide in Men With High-Risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Progressing After Definitive Therapy
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocompatibility and Toxicity Evaluation of an Elastin-Based Nanogel Carrier for Enzalutamide: Comprehensive Characterization, Controlled Release and Assessment in Zebrafish Embryos.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Article
- Enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: key findings from subsequent analyses of EMBARK and their implications in clinical practice.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: clinical implications from EMBARK for real-world practice.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enzalutamide was approved for high-risk biochemically recurrent (hrBCR) prostate cancer based on the EMBARK trial (NCT02319837; 17 December 2014-31 January 2023). In EMBARK, treatment was suspended at week 37 if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was <0.2 ng/mL and reinstated if PSA rose to ≥2.0 ng/mL with radical prostatectomy or ≥5.0 ng/mL without. This post hoc analysis assessed the impact of treatment suspension on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) to address overtreatment concerns. Methods: Longitudinal change in HRQoL from treatment suspension at week 37 to subsequent assessments until week 109 was analyzed with mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) and descriptively among these patients. Separate models were used to assess four patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments-Brief Pain Inventory - short form, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate, QoL Questionnaire - Prostate 25, and European QoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels health questionnaire-with predefined clinically meaningful thresholds. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Findings: Treatment was suspended in 90% (321/355), 86% (304/355), and 67% (240/358) of participants treated with enzalutamide + leuprolide, enzalutamide monotherapy, and leuprolide alone, respectively. MMRM showed no meaningful change in any treatment arm after treatment suspension across all assessed PRO measures, except hormonal treatment-related symptoms, for which clinically meaningful improvement was observed after treatment suspension at week 61 for enzalutamide monotherapy, week 73 for leuprolide alone, and week 85 for enzalutamide + leuprolide. The descriptive analysis showed similar findings. Interpretation: Enzalutamide ± leuprolide in patients with hrBCR improves metastasis-free survival versus leuprolide alone with no clinically meaningful changes in the measured HRQoL domains during treatment or after treatment suspension, with gradual improvement in hormonal treatment-related symptoms after treatment suspension in this selective clinical trial population. Further real-world studies are warranted to better explore the benefits of treatment suspension. Funding: This study was funded by Pfizer Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.