Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838157›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Combining techniques and technologies increases adenoma detection rates in colonoscopy: More is more.

Ioannis Stasinos, Theodoros A Voulgaris, Theodoros Alexopoulos, Georgios P Karamanolis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ioannis StasinosDepartment of Gastroenterology, 417 Army Equity Fund Hospital (NIMTS), Athens 11528, Greece.
Theodoros A VoulgarisDepartment of Endoscopy, 2 Academic Surgical Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece. thvoulgaris87@gmail.com.
Theodoros AlexopoulosDepartment of Endoscopy, East Kent Hospital University, NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent CT91UJ, United Kingdom.
Georgios P KaramanolisDepartment of Endoscopy, 2 Academic Surgical Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening colonoscopy with adenoma removal is the gold standard strategy to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. Nevertheless, it remains an imperfect tool as nearly Twenty-five percent of adenomas can be missed during inspection by experienced endoscopists. Missed lesions are one of the primary reasons for post colonoscopy CRC and are associated with a significant variability in adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is the most important quality indicator for colonoscopy. Increasing ADR unquestionably decreases carcinoma miss rate. Simple measures to improve ADR include among others slower withdrawal time and position change. The introduction of optical imaging innovations has improved mucosal visualization. Moreover, auxiliary devices attached to the colonoscope tip have been introduced, aiming to improve lumen visualization by flattening the folds and revealing lesions hidden in blind spots, thereby increasing ADR. Digital image analysis using artificial intelligence is the latest approach to polyp detection. All of the above approaches have been separately evaluated concerning their effect in ADR; however, it has not been thoroughly investigated whether any benefit exists from their combined use. We aim to review the available data on the efficacy of each technique/technology and whether their combination offers any additional benefit while remaining cost-effective.

Indexed as

Adenoma detection rateComputer-aided diagnosis systemsEndocuffOptical imaging innovationsScreening colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40838157
PMCPMC12362565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.