ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Minimally invasive approaches to obesity: Evaluating the efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastroplasty.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Diabetes Remission, Glycemic Control and Body Weight Loss.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is a major global health issue, contributing to numerous comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. While bariatric surgery remains the gold standard for treating severe obesity, its invasive nature has led to the development of minimally invasive alternatives. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a promising, minimally invasive procedure for weight loss, offering significant weight reduction without the need for surgical incisions. This editorial evaluates the efficacy and safety of ESG, highlighting its weight loss outcomes, safety profile, and comparison with other bariatric procedures, including intragastric balloon, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and robotic sleeve gastrectomy. ESG has shown substantial weight loss with a mean total weight loss ranging from 15.03% to 17.51% at 12 months and sustained weight reduction over 36 months. The safety profile is favorable, with low rates of serious adverse events and minimal complications compared to surgical alternatives. ESG is particularly suited for patients with mild to moderate obesity or those not eligible for surgical options. However, further long-term studies and standardized protocols are needed to refine patient selection and optimize treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.