ReviewMedical review (2021)2025
A review of 3D bioprinting for organoids.
Review in Medical review (2021), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hallmarks of lung cancer driven by inhalable particulate matter: From cell-intrinsic oncogenic traits to microenvironment remodeling.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- From monolayer to organoids and multi-organ microphysiological systems: advancing regenerative medicine and precision therapies.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Decoding triple negative breast cancer bone metastasis: from 3D bioprinted models to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Organoids as next-generation models for investigating intracranial tumours.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- Organoids in Pediatric Congenital Hepatobiliary Diseases: Current Status and Progress in Clinical Translational Research.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Highly Tunable and Cell-Remodelable Thiol-ene Alginate-Peptide Crosslinked Hydrogels to Recreate Cellular and Organoid Microenvironments for Biofabrication.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- The Synthetic Extracellular Matrix as a Maestro of the In Vitro Stem Cell Niche: Orchestrating Fate and Function.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Cell sources and engineering strategies for cultured meat production: a critical comparative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Organ-Specific Strategies in Bioprinting: Addressing Translational Challenges in the Heart, Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Mechanobiology in Action: Biomaterials, Devices, and the Cellular Machinery of Force Sensing.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Oral stem cells in combination with hydrogels as biomimetic bioactive platforms for periodontal tissue engineering.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- Engineering next-generation organoids: A review on bioprinting strategies, bioink innovations, and frontier applications.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current two-dimensional (2D) cell models for effective drug screening suffer from significant limitations imposed by the lack of realism in the physiological environment. Three-dimensional (3D) organoids models hold immense potential in mimicking the key functions of human organs by overcoming the limitations of traditional 2D cell models. However, current techniques for preparation of 3D organoids models had limitations in reproducibility, scalability, and the ability to closely replicate the complex microenvironment found
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.