ReviewMedical review (2021)2025
The potential of generative AI with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT: challenges and future directions.
Review in Medical review (2021), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of PSMA-RADS Version 2.0 versus bone uptake metastatic probability (BUMP) score for characterising focal bone uptake on [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in prostate cancer - a multicentre evaluation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- The role of multimodality imaging in selection, response assessment, and follow-up of patients receivingInsights into imaging · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Imaging.Balkan medical journal · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis and prognosis of Prostate cancer (PCa) have undergone a significant transformation with the advent of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. PSMA-PET imaging has demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional imaging methods by detecting PCa, its biochemical recurrence, and sites of metastasis with higher sensitivity and specificity. That transformation now intersects with rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) - including the emergence of generative AI. However, there are unique clinical challenges associated with PSMA-PET imaging that still need to be addressed to ensure its continued widespread integration into clinical care and research trials. Some of those challenges are the very wide dynamic range of lesion uptake, benign uptake in organs that may be adjacent to sites of disease, insufficient large datasets for training AI models, as well as artifacts in the images. Generative AI models, e.g., generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, diffusion models, and large language models have played crucial roles in overcoming many such challenges across various imaging modalities, including PET, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, etc. In this review article, we delve into the potential role of generative AI in enhancing the robustness and widespread utilization of PSMA-PET imaging and image analysis, drawing insights from existing literature while also exploring current limitations and future directions in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.