Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838037›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

What is the role of common sense oncology in the Western Pacific?

Samuel Xavier Stevens, Christopher G C A Jackson, Deme Karikios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel Xavier StevensDepartment of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Sinclair Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Christopher G C A JacksonMercy Cancer Care, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Deme KarikiosFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Established in 2023, Common Sense Oncology (CSO) is a grass roots initiative uniting cancer clinicians, policymakers, academics, patients and their advocates that calls for a 'recalibration' of cancer care to focus on outcomes that matter to patients. CSO emphasises treatments that substantially improve survival and quality of life, and advocates for equitable global access to effective cancer therapies. This article examines the potential of CSO principles to improve cancer care in the Western Pacific, a geographically and culturally diverse region that shoulders one-third of the global cancer burden. We review early progress of CSO working groups and identify regional challenges, such as engaging diverse membership, fostering local change, and evaluating impact. Unique regional strengths, such as longstanding cooperative trial group and China's growing influence in global drug development, are highlighted.

Indexed as

Cancer careClinical trialsCommon Sense Oncology (CSO)Healthcare costsHealthcare policyHealth equityValueWestern Pacific

Identifiers

PMID40838037
PMCPMC12361800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.