Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40838026›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods & applications2025

Hypothesis Tests of Indirect Effects for Multiple Mediators.

John Kidd, Annie Green Howard, Heather M Highland, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Michael Patrick Bancks, Mercedes Carnethon, Dan-Yu Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods & applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John KiddDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. .
Annie Green HowardDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. .
Heather M HighlandDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. .
Penny Gordon-LarsenCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. .
Michael Patrick BancksDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A..
Mercedes CarnethonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Dan-Yu LinDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. .

Funding

Leveraging multi-omics approaches to examine metabolic challenges of obesity in relation to cardiovascular diseasesR01HL143885 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AVERY, CHRISTY LEIGH, GORDON-LARSEN, PENNY · 2019 to 2022
$8.9M
Program Development (Pilot) CoreP30AG066615 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TAYLOR HARGROVE · 2020 to 2026
$4.1M
Inflammatory mediators of cardiometabolic risk in LatinosR01HL147853 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AVERY, CHRISTY LEIGH · 2020 to 2023
$3.8M
Statistical Methods in Trans-Omics Chronic Disease ResearchR01HG009974 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009974NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143885NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL147853NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediation analysis seeks to determine whether an independent variable affects a response directly or whether it does so indirectly, by way of a mediator or mediators. Scenarios that assume a single mediation are often overly simplistic, and analyses that include multiple mediators are becoming more common, particularly with the incorporation of high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, however, little attention has been given to multiple mediator and interaction effects. In this article, we propose new methods for testing the null hypothesis of no indirect effect with multiple mediators and interaction effects. We allow the estimators of the path effects to be possibly correlated; we also consider the practice of using confidence intervals to determine whether a mediation effect is zero. We compare the performance of our proposed method with existing methods through extensive simulation studies. Finally, we provide an application to data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

Indexed as

Confidence intervalsJoint significance testMediation analysisMediation pathwayMissing data

Identifiers

PMID40838026
PMCPMC12362339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.