ArticleAsian journal of transfusion science
Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and response regarding transfusion-transmitted infections in blood donors sero-reactive for viral markers during postdonation counselling as an attempt to identify and bridge the gaps in the blood donation process.
Article in Asian journal of transfusion science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDonor notification and counseling have been mandated by the Indian action plan for blood safety to facilitate the early diagnosis and subsequent management of sero-reactive blood donors as well as to prevent the spread of infection through subsequent blood donations. This retrospective and questionnaire-based study was conducted with the aim of understanding the level of knowledge, difference in attitudes, and pattern of responses of sero-reactive blood donors which could aid in designing of clear and unambiguous donor educational program as well as enhance the effectiveness of donor selection procedures. Furthermore, the rates of donors' response to notification and compliance to clinical referral were assessed to find the areas which require improvement.
methodsBlood donors sero-reactive for viral markers were notified and subjected to postdonation counselling and were asked questions to assess their knowledge, attitude, and response. Retrospective analysis of data of 5 years was done. Donors were followed up by enquiring their status 6 months' postreferral.
resultsOf the 1991 repeat reactive blood donors, 1256 (63.08%) responded for counseling and referral. Long distance and busy schedule were the most common reasons for nonresponse. Lack of privacy and lack of understanding were the main reason for nondisclosure of pertinent information by blood donors. On follow-up, 634 (50.48%) of those counseled actually visited the prescribed referral center.
conclusionDonor counseling should be done by a trained counselor ensuring an understanding of the importance of transfusion-transmitted infection transmission. Donors should be informed about high-risk behavior and self-exclusion should be facilitated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.