Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837936›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Adverse Effects and Patient Perceptions of Unregulated Arthritis Supplements: A Retrospective Mixed-Methods Study at a Safety-Net Primary Care Clinic.

Vi D Nguyen, Elizabeth M Canales, Kenneth Pettersen, Arash Nafisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vi D NguyenDepartment of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Elizabeth M CanalesDepartment of Medicine, Olive View - University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Kenneth PettersenDepartment of Medicine, Olive View - University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Arash NafisiDepartment of Medicine, Olive View - University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The use of complementary and alternative medicine is prevalent among individuals living with chronic pain. Artri King and similarly branded over-the-counter supplements are advertised as natural arthritis pain relievers but have been found to contain hidden prescription drugs including dexamethasone, diclofenac, and methocarbamol. These unbranded pharmaceutical agents may pose significant health risks, particularly when used without clinical oversight or in combination with other therapies. This study sought to understand patient experiences, perceptions, and motivations for using these supplements despite FDA warnings and the associated potential for harm. Materials and methods Between April 2024 and March 2025, clinicians at an urban, academic safety-net primary care clinic in California identified patients who reported using over-the-counter arthritis pain supplements. Clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted to assess patient-reported motivations, product understanding, duration, dosage, quantity of use, symptom relief, and side effects. Results Clinicians identified 14 patients taking arthritis pain supplements reported by the FDA as containing undisclosed drugs (Artri King, Artri Ajo King, RM Flex); 12 of these patients completed phone interviews for this study. Motivations for supplement use included word-of-mouth recommendations, inadequate pain relief from prescribed treatments, and the belief that the supplements were "natural" and therefore safe. All patients reported significant pain relief. None were aware of the presence of hidden ingredients or the potential for adverse effects. Over half of the patients reported side effects. Of the five patients who underwent morning cortisol testing, three had levels consistent with adrenal insufficiency. Additional adverse events during the period of supplement use included cardiovascular and gastrointestinal complications. Of the 12 patients interviewed, 11 discontinued the supplement, of whom 8 stopped after recommendation from their physician. Conclusion Despite FDA warnings, patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain continue to use over-the-counter arthritis supplements due to community recommendation, perceived safety of the supplement, and limited relief from conventional therapies. Many are unaware of hidden pharmaceutical ingredients and experience serious adverse effects. Clinicians should routinely screen for supplement use, particularly in high-risk populations; provide clear, empathetic education about potential risks; and discuss safer pain management strategies.

Indexed as

adrenal insufficiencyarthritisartri kingchronic paincomplementary and alternative medicineglucocorticoidmedication reconciliationsupplementsupplement use

Identifiers

PMID40837936
PMCPMC12364540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.