ArticleCureus2025
Discrepant Bleeding Patterns in a Case of Simultaneous Injuries: Hemodynamic Consequences of Bilateral Carotid Artery Transection.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In forensic practice, differences in hemorrhage volume among multiple injuries are often used to estimate the timing of trauma. We report a rare case in which multiple injuries sustained simultaneously exhibited marked discrepancies in hemorrhagic presentation. A man in his 30s was found deceased at the scene of a single-vehicle accident, in which his car had collided with a barrier. Forensic autopsy revealed complete bilateral transection of the common carotid arteries, cervical spinal cord transection, and cervical spine fractures. Additional injuries included a liver laceration and a lower leg contusion, both of which showed minimal associated hemorrhage. The bilateral carotid artery injury was determined to be the immediate cause of death. Based on hemodynamic principles, including Hagen-Poiseuille's law, we hypothesize that the abrupt reduction in vascular resistance at the transected carotid stumps formed a low-resistance, short-circuit pathway, diverting the majority of cardiac output toward the open carotid arteries. This resulted in rapid exsanguination and minimal bleeding at other injury sites. This case underscores the importance of accounting for hemodynamic factors when evaluating wound vitality, as exclusive reliance on hemorrhage volume may lead to misinterpretation of injury timing or cause of death, particularly in complex trauma cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.