ArticleRegenerative therapy2025
Stem/progenitor cell dynamics during salivary gland development and regeneration demonstrated by the double pulse-chase paradigm.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glycogen shunt is essential for submandibular gland morphogenesis.Cell and tissue research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Active and quiescent stem cells coexist in hair follicles and intestinal crypts; however, their localization and differentiation potential in the salivary dynamics are unknown. This study aimed to clarify the cellular dynamics that occur during salivary gland development and regeneration in the duct ligation model with a focus on the role of label retaining cells (LRCs), presumably quiescent stem cells, in these processes. Methods: Doxycycline-inducible TetOP-histone 2B (H2B)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice [GFP expression was induced during embryonic day 15 (E15)-postnatal day 7 (P7)] followed by EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine) administration at P10-14 to chase the LRCs during development. In addition, LRCs were labeled with GFP immediately before salivary gland duct ligation and EdU was administered after the ligation was released to chase the LRCs with GFP and EdU during tissue repair. Results and conclusions: During development, GFP (+) EdU (-) LRCs were abundant in striated duct cells (SDCs) and GFP (+) EdU (+) LRCs were primarily localized to the intercalated duct cells (IDCs) at P21. Labeling of the GFP (+) LRCs faded as well as the EdU (+) LRCs at P70. During tissue repair, GFP (+) EdU (+) LRCs were colocalized in the IDCs and myoepithelium cells (MECs), whereas the GFP (+) EdU (+) acinar cells (ACs) appeared over time. These results suggest that salivary gland quiescent stem/progenitor cells are present in the IDCs during development and that quiescent stem/progenitor cells in the IDCs and MECs differentiate into ACs during tissue repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.