ReviewNanoscale advances2025
The synergy of metal-organic frameworks and biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: recent advances, challenges, and future recommendations.
Review in Nanoscale advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strontium‑based metal‑organic framework/alendronate‑silk fibroin hydrogels promote tendon‑bone interface healing.Molecular medicine reports · 2026Article
- Bibliometric and visualized analysis of metal‒organic frameworks in bone tissue engineering and bone diseases.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Advances in biomimetic mineralized biomaterials for bone tissue engineering.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Converging chemistry and clinical orthopedics in the emerging role of MOFs in advanced bone defect repair.Theranostics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has recently been a noticeable increase in the prevalence of bone-related conditions, including osteoarthritis, arthritis, fractures, bone cancer, and infections, thereby creating an urgent demand for advanced biomaterials in regenerative medicine. Among emerging candidates, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), with their large surface area, tunable porosity, and inherent bioactivity, have demonstrated considerable potential in bone tissue engineering. Initially, research focused on pristine MOFs as bioactive scaffolds or drug delivery vehicles due to their capacity for controlled encapsulation and release of therapeutic agents. However, issues such as poor stability, potential toxicity, and limited mechanical strength have driven the development of MOF-based composites. By incorporating MOFs into hydrogels, electrospun fibers, biocements, and three-dimensional scaffolds, researchers have improved biocompatibility, enhanced structural integrity, and achieved synergistic effects on bone regeneration. Consequently, these composites offer multifunctional platforms that simultaneously provide mechanical support, local drug delivery, and osteoinductive cues. This review highlights recent advances in the field, analyzes key limitations, and emphasizes the need for systematic strategies in design, synthesis, and evaluation. Furthermore, the integration of computational modeling and machine learning is proposed as a promising direction for optimizing material performance and accelerating clinical translation. Ultimately, interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to realize the full potential of next-generation MOF-based composites in bone repair and regenerative therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.