Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837782›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in surgery2025

Efficacy and safety of the flexible negative-pressure ureteral sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lin Wang, Zhifang Luo, Wen Huang, Qilei Jia

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lin WangDepartment of Basic Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhifang LuoDepartment of Basic Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wen HuangDepartment of Basic Medicine, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qilei JiaDepartment of Urology, People's Hospital of Qingbaijiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the flexible negative-pressure ureteral sheath (FANS) in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RIRS) for urinary calculi. Methods: Computerized searches were performed in English databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to 4 February 2025, to identify clinical studies on the FANS combined with RIRS for urinary calculi. Data analysis and extraction were conducted using Stata 18.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: This meta-analysis of nine studies (1,785 patients) showed that the FANS significantly improved stone-free rates [odds ratio (OR) = 2.58, 95% CI = 2.11-3.15] and reduced intraoperative complications (OR = 0.32, Conclusions: The FANS enhances RIRS efficacy and safety by improving stone clearance, reducing complications, and minimizing auxiliary instrument use. While it did not shorten hospitalization or overall operative time, its advantages in removing larger stones and laser compatibility underscore its clinical value. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42024611779).

Indexed as

flexible and navigable suctionmeta-analysis.renal calculiretrograde intrarenal surgeryurinary calculi

Identifiers

PMID40837782
PMCPMC12361250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.