ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2025
Machine Learning Enables Rapid Detection of Slips Using a Robotic Hip Exoskeleton.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and Testing of a Wearable Lower-Limb Exoskeleton for Investigating Falls Prevention.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fall incidents due to slips are some of the most common causes of injuries for industry workers and older adults, motivating research to assist balance recovery following slips. To assist balance recovery during a slip, a detection algorithm that can work with an assistive device, such as an exoskeleton, needs to be able to detect slips rapidly after onset, which remains a critical gap in the field. Here, we compared the ability of linear discriminant analysis (LDA), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and convolutional neural networks (CNN) to detect slip using only native sensors on a hip exoskeleton. We trained and evaluated user-independent models on early-stance (ES) and late-stance (LS) slips of various magnitudes collected through treadmill-based slips. All models, except LDA with LS slips, detected slips with >90% accuracy. Overall, he best model was XGBoost, with its fastest results achieving average detection times and median accuracies of 155.06 ms at 96.25% for ES slips and 228.88 ms at 93.75% for LS slips, while also achieving 100% sensitivity at 195.64 ms (ES) and 266.24 ms (LS). Our results indicate a promising direction for further research into designing a generalizable model for balance recovery during slip perturbations using robotic hip exoskeletons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.