ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025
Intravascular lithotripsy as a treatment option for recalcitrant in-stent restenosis in symptomatic patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reinterventions after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction have an incidence of approximately 20% to 40% in the literature. The most common reason for this tends to be in-stent restenosis (ISR). Although angioplasty historically has been the modality used to treat this problem, at times ISR can be robust and associated with calcium deposits, leading to an inadequate outcome. Although newer debulking devices like the RevCore can be helpful, sometimes even these devices are not adequate given their inability to secure a foothold on the fibrotic tissue to enable its removal. Using an intravascular lithotripsy catheter (12 mm) helps to soften the fibrotic tissue and fracture the calcium deposits, thus enabling angioplasty or a debulking device (if needed) to be successful. This case series outlines the author's experience with three patients with recalcitrant ISR who benefited from using an intravascular lithotripsy catheter that enabled prolonged symptom improvement and stent patency over a follow-up of 19 months. However, the use of such a catheter for the treatment of venous ISR represents an off-label use of the device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.