Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837727›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025

Intravascular lithotripsy as a treatment option for recalcitrant in-stent restenosis in symptomatic patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

Arjun Jayaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arjun JayarajThe RANE Center for Venous & Lymphatic Diseases, St Dominic Hospital, Jackson, MS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinterventions after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction have an incidence of approximately 20% to 40% in the literature. The most common reason for this tends to be in-stent restenosis (ISR). Although angioplasty historically has been the modality used to treat this problem, at times ISR can be robust and associated with calcium deposits, leading to an inadequate outcome. Although newer debulking devices like the RevCore can be helpful, sometimes even these devices are not adequate given their inability to secure a foothold on the fibrotic tissue to enable its removal. Using an intravascular lithotripsy catheter (12 mm) helps to soften the fibrotic tissue and fracture the calcium deposits, thus enabling angioplasty or a debulking device (if needed) to be successful. This case series outlines the author's experience with three patients with recalcitrant ISR who benefited from using an intravascular lithotripsy catheter that enabled prolonged symptom improvement and stent patency over a follow-up of 19 months. However, the use of such a catheter for the treatment of venous ISR represents an off-label use of the device.

Indexed as

Chronic iliofemoral venous obstructionIliofemoral venous stentIn-stent restenosisIntravascular lithotripsyMay-Thurner syndromeVenous stenting

Identifiers

PMID40837727
PMCPMC12361985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.