Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837676›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Impact of growth parameters on refraction and ocular biometry in Chinese preschool children (3-6 years): the Beijing children eye study.

Chao Wang, Jing Yuan, Qing Xu, Aimin Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chao WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, China.
Aimin JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to investigate the relationship between growth and ocular biometry/refraction in preschool children aged 3-6 years. Methods: This study performed a retrospective evaluation utilizing anonymized data from a pre-existing cohort of children aged 3-6 years, who were recruited from 11 kindergartens in the Shunyi District of Beijing. Out of the 1,144 children assessed, a total of 1,021 (89.2%) were included in the final analysis. The gathered data adhered to ethical guidelines suitable for subsequent analysis. Information on sex, age, stature, mass, and body mass index (BMI) served as indicators of growth and developmental stages. Ocular measurements such as axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were obtained using the Lenstar LS900 device. Cycloplegic refraction and corneal curvature were assessed with an autorefractor. The correlation between growth metrics and ocular parameters, including refraction, was examined. To determine statistical significance, regression analyses were carried out. Results: After making adjustments for age, sex, and weight, every 1-cm increment in height corresponded to a 0.017 mm rise in AL and a 0.005 mm increase in ACD. Regarding weight, following adjustments for age, sex, and height, each 1-kg increase was linked to a 0.017 mm augmentation in AL and a 0.006 mm rise in corneal curvature. Comparable significant correlations were also noted with BMI. Conclusion: Higher child height is correlated with longer AL, deeper anterior chamber, and flatter cornea. Weight and BMI show similar associations with AL and corneal curvature radius.

Indexed as

axial lengthgrowth and developmentocular biometrypreschool childrenrefraction

Identifiers

PMID40837676
PMCPMC12361256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.