ArticleIEEE sensors journal2025
Diaphragm Design for an Electret Microphone Stethoscope.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article investigates the design elements of a digital stethoscope and its signal fidelity in the presence of ambient noise. While the acoustic impedance matching literature demonstrates that signal pickup can improve when the diaphragm's acoustic impedance closely matches that of the auscultated surface, this approach considers only one interface between two materials. Acoustic impedance matching with two materials may not explain the full picture for electret microphones, which introduce an air gap in their design and therefore have two interfaces between three materials. Introducing a hole in the electret stethoscope diaphragm reduces the three material impedance matching problem into a two material problem. Our empirical results with a 3-D printed electret stethoscope show that a hole in the diaphragm improves signal quality in a variety of tested settings. We additionally propose signal fidelity and noise leakage statistics, a signal quality score, and an amplitude spectrum, all based on the empirical distance correlation. We utilize these statistics to evaluate how all combinations of four diaphragm materials, six diaphragm thicknesses, and presence or absence of a hole affect signal quality of lung sounds in different ambient noise conditions on an acoustic phantom. Moreover, a result of this work is the fabrication of a high-quality and low-cost (U.S. $5) digital stethoscope that can be fabricated with a 3-D printer, soldering iron, electret microphone, and readily available materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.