ArticleGlobal implementation research and applications2025
Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of Fluoride Varnish Application in Pediatric Well-Child Visits: A Post-Implementation Analysis.
Article in Global implementation research and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are chatbots reliable sources of information regarding fluoride in pediatric dentistry?BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Addressing Research Gaps in Early Childhood Caries: A Comprehensive Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Insurance Denials for Fluoride Varnish and Well-Child Visits.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Changes in Children's Receipt of Fluoride Varnish During Medical Visits and the COVID-19 Pandemic.Academic pediatricsArticle
- Integrating Fluoride Varnish Delivery in Primary Care: Insights from a Workflow and Cost Analysis.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early childhood caries affects many children, posing risks to dental and overall health. Fluoride varnish application during pediatric well-child visits has demonstrated efficacy in mitigating decay, yet rates remain notably low among medical providers. This study delves into the details of fluoride varnish adoption and delivery in pediatric practices and identifies associated barriers and facilitators by employing the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Semi-structured interviews were the primary research method, involving participants from diverse roles within medical practices in Georgia that had previously implemented fluoride varnish application. Interviews covered aspects such as the participant's role, background in fluoride varnish application, understanding of evidence supporting fluoride varnish, factors influencing the process, and the impact on their practice. The partnerships and connections that introduced providers to fluoride varnish application and their knowledge of the evidence base led to its adoption in medical practices. Integration of fluoride varnish application into electronic health records, the motivation providers felt from understanding the patient needs related to oral health, and strategies for engaging patients served as important facilitators. Important barriers encompassed the low relative priority of fluoride varnish application compared to other demands during well-child visits, parent beliefs, and patient resistance. This study details important barriers and facilitators to initial adoption and consistent delivery of fluoride varnish application in primary care well-child visits. In practices not currently offering fluoride varnish, findings may guide and facilitate adoption, while in practices offering fluoride varnish, findings may help optimize delivery and further integration of the innovation into workflows. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-025-00160-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.