ArticleAfrican health sciences2025
Alveolar ridge height changes in adults and adolescents with angle class I malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment.
Article in African health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Innovations and African Health Sciences: telling it beyond our environs.African health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study compared the changes in alveolar ridge height in adult and adolescent patients with Angle Class I malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment. Methodology: A total of 110 patients, 55 adults (18 years and above) and 55 adolescents (10 to less than 18 years), were included. The research focused on alveolar bone thickness and changes in ridge height. Results: Results showed no significant differences in alveolar ridge thickness between the groups at various locations. Adults had thinner alveolar ridges at 7 mm and 9 mm compared to adolescents. Post-treatment, adults experienced increased ridge height in specific regions, while adolescents had minor changes. Some craniofacial angles and chin concavity differed between the groups. Adults exhibited a higher incidence of bone cracking, with an increase post-treatment. Adolescents didn't show significant changes in bone cracking. Conclusion: In conclusion, orthodontists should customize treatment for Angle Class I malocclusion based on age-specific findings. Adolescents may experience minor alveolar changes, while adults exhibit increased ridge height and higher fracture risk post-treatment. Monitoring and adapting plans accordingly ensure effective and safe outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.