ArticleAfrican health sciences2025
Associated factors of spontaneous reperfusion in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction before primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in African health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Innovations and African Health Sciences: telling it beyond our environs.African health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This is a retrospective analysis of the relationship between preoperative factors and spontaneous reperfusion (SR) in infarct-related arteries (IRAs) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methodology: 834 patients who were classified into the SR group (TIMI flow grade 2-3) and non-spontaneous reperfusion (NSR) group (TIMI flow grade 0-1) based on coronary angiography. The baseline characteristics and preoperative factors of the two groups were analyzed. Results: Compared with the NSR group, the SR group had shorter time from symptom onset to first medical contact (P=0.002) and from symptom onset to antiplatelet loading (P=0.003), however, there was no statistically significant difference in the mode of admission and loading of antiplatelet drugs between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that diabetes history, smoking history, triglyceride level, time from symptom onset to first medical contact, time from symptom onset to antiplatelet loading, and time from antiplatelet loading to coronary angiography were all factors influencing SR were all factors influencing SR. Conclusion: The occurrence of SR is related to early medical contact and timely use of antiplatelet drugs. Patients with diabetes history, smoking history, higher triglyceride level may benefit more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.