Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837627›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2025

Analysis of factors related to tip malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter and its spontaneous correction rate in neonates.

Lizhu Chen, Kunying Zhuang, Meili Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lizhu ChenDepartment of Neonatel Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou Woman's and Children's Hospital, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Kunying ZhuangDepartment of Neonatel Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou Woman's and Children's Hospital, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Meili ZhangDepartment of Neonatel Intensive Care Unit, Quanzhou Woman's and Children's Hospital, Quanzhou 362000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To analyze the factors associated with tip malposition and spontaneous correction rate of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in newborns. Methods: Clinical data of 1604 newborns who underwent PICC placement in our neonatal surgery department from January 2018 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into malposition group (n=104) and normal group (n=1500) according to the occurrence of tip malposition. The relevant clinical data of newborns were extracted from the hospital information system. The occurrence of PICC tip malposition and spontaneous correction were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PICC tip malposition in newborns. Results: The incidence of PICC malposition was 6.48%. There were significant differences in gestational age, birth weight, lesion location, catheter direction and venous placement between the two groups (P<0.05). The independent risk factors for PICC tip malposition in newborns were lesion location, catheter direction and venous placement (P<0.05). The spontaneous correction rate within 24 hours was 27.88%, with the highest rate observed in malposition of the internal jugular vein. Conclusion: Catheter direction, lesion location and venous placement are independent risk factors for PICC tip malposition in newborns, and some newborns may spontaneously correct within 24 hours.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersFemaleGestational AgeHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsneonatal carePeripherally inserted central catheterspontaneous correctiontip malposition

Identifiers

PMID40837627
PMCPMC12361950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.