ArticleOTO open
Socioeconomic and Cost Analysis of Off-Label Nebulized Ciprofloxacin-Dexamethasone Use Following Airway Surgery.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety Profile of Nebulized Ciprofloxacin-Dexamethasone After Pediatric Airway Surgery.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Nebulized ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone (CPD) is an adjuvant, off-label treatment used to optimize healing after airway surgery, but there is limited data regarding its accessibility. This study examined socioeconomic factors influencing CPD utilization and assessed its cost. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Single institution tertiary care center. Methods: All patients prescribed nebulized CPD after endoscopic airway surgery from 2021 to 24 by a single surgeon were analyzed for associations between CPD access and socioeconomic factors including insurance type and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). The typical regimen was 2 mL CPD ophthalmic solution nebulized twice daily for 4 weeks. A model to estimate CPD cost combined retail pricing from GoodRx with cost-sharing calculations from Medicare plans including Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS), and Cigna, incorporating co-pays, coinsurance, and deductibles. Results: Out of 59 patients prescribed CPD postoperatively, 52 (88.1%) filled their prescription. Patients with Medicaid and Medicare were less likely to access CPD than those with commercial insurance ( Conclusion: Nebulized CPD was utilized by most patients regardless of ADI, but less accessible for those with Medicaid and Medicare. Prescribing the ophthalmic formulation instead of otic may significantly reduce cost and promote more equitable care postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.