ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Hybrid deep learning enables multi-institutional delineation of active bone marrow for gynecologic radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer inevitably irradiates sensitive areas like iliac bones, lumbar vertebrae, and sacrum. Using Materials and methods: We analyzed 319 patients from five institutions retrospectively. ABM was divided into three 18F-FDG PET/CT-defined subregions: active iliac bone marrow (A_IBM), active sacral bone marrow (A_SBM), and active lumbar vertebrae bone marrow (A_LVBM), defined as areas with standardized uptake values exceeding subregional means. Six deep learning models were trained: hybrid nnU-Net, U-Net, V-Net, ResU-Net, nnU-Net, and UNETR. The hybrid nnU-Net approach integrated nnU-Net predictions with anatomical bone structures via Boolean operations, providing a post-processing strategy. The dataset was split into 290 cases for training and 29 for independent testing. Performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Two clinical cases were prospectively evaluated for ABM-sparing radiotherapy with hematologic monitoring. Results: The hybrid nnU-Net achieved the highest DSCs for A_IBM (0.74 ± 0.06), A_LVBM (0.79 ± 0.07), and A_SBM (0.75 ± 0.06), with significant improvements over most models (p < 0.001), except nnU-Net. Despite ResU-Net's lower HD95 in two subregions, hybrid nnU-Net showed superior accuracy. No grade ≥2 hematologic toxicity occurred in prospective cases. Conclusion: This multi-institutional study confirms that the hybrid nnU-Net accurately segments ABM from CT images, showing potential for ABM-sparing radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.