Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837575›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Development and validation of a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary healthcare settings in China.

Shang Yong-Guang, Qin Wang-Jun, Guo Dong-Jie, Li Peng-Mei, Zhang Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shang Yong-Guang *Department of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qin Wang-Jun *Department of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guo Dong-JieDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li Peng-MeiDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhang LeiDepartment of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medication safety remains a global public health challenge, particularly in resource-constrained primary care settings. This study aimed to develop and validate a specific, proactive, medication safety self-assessment tool tailored for primary healthcare settings in China. Methods: A mixed-methods approach combining literature review, field investigations, a Delphi expert consultation (3 rounds), and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was implemented. Forty-three voluntarily participating settings completed the self-assessment, with effectiveness validated through correlation analysis between assessment scores and adverse drug events (ADEs) indicators (medication errors, dispensing/prescribing errors). Results: We constructed a medication safety self-assessment tool for primary care settings comprising 5 domains, 18 core characteristics, and 84 self-assessment items. The mean percent score for 43 participating primary care settings was 81.5% ± 11.7%, and Spearman's rank correlations were used to examine the relationship between the overall assessment scores to the incidence of ADEs (Correlation Coefficient is -0.448, Conclusion: As the first medication safety assessment tool for Chinese primary healthcare settings, based on current medication practices and validated through ADE, implementation demonstrates potential to enhance medication safety practices.

Indexed as

analytic hierarchy processDelphi methodmedication safetyprimary healthcare settingrisk managementself-assessment

Identifiers

PMID40837575
PMCPMC12361196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.