ArticleJHLT open2025
Alterations in implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead parameters following left ventricular assist device implantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used in the management of advanced heart failure. The majority of these patients have pre-existing implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). The proximity between the LVAD inflow cannula and right ventricular (RV) defibrillation lead raises the potential for disruption of ICD function. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 95 patients with ICDs at a single tertiary care center who underwent LVAD implantation and who met inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was changes in the pre-operative and post-operative transvenous ICD RV lead parameters. These changes were stratified by the age of the RV lead and analyzed via a paired t-test. The secondary outcome was disruption to the ICD requiring an intervention. Results: LVAD implantation was associated with significant decreases in sensed amplitude (p < 0.01) and high voltage impedance (p < 0.01) and an increase in capture threshold (p = 0.017). When stratified by age of the RV lead, patients with leads older than two years had similar trends in all parameters. However, RV leads that were two years old or younger only showed a significant change in high voltage impedance (p < 0.01). Mechanical disruption of the ICD related to the surgery was infrequent but significant. Conclusion: Because LVAD implantation is capable of impacting ICD function and causing mechanical disruption, close monitoring should be paid to the ICD in the peri-operative period including obtaining a full interrogation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.