ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
SURGICAL DELAY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBAXIAL FRACTURE.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study investigated the waiting time for surgery in patients with severe subaxial cervical fractures at Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, as well as identifying the main causes of surgical delays. Methods: The research was quantitative and retrospective, utilizing medical records of patients operated on between January 2015 and June 2023. Variables analyzed included age, gender, trauma mechanism, fracture classification, neurological status, waiting time until surgery, and causes of delay. Data were initially collected using physical forms and then migrated to electronic platforms (SurveyMonkey Results: The study included 36 patients, with a significant predominance of men (86.1%) and an average age of 44.97 years. Falls were the most common trauma mechanism (44.4%), followed by automobile accidents (27.8%). Most fractures occurred at the C4/C5 (16.7%) and C5/C6 (13.9%) levels. The most frequent AO type classification was type C (47.2%). The average waiting time for surgery was 9.28 days, with the main cause of delay being the availability of the operating room (66.7%). Conclusion: The results indicate that cervical fractures have a significant impact on young adults, predominantly men, often associated with falls and automobile accidents. Early identification and timely surgical intervention are crucial to minimize complications and improve neurological outcomes. Strategies to reduce surgical waiting times, such as improvements in hospital resource management, are essential to optimize the treatment of these injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.