ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2025
LUMBAR FACET ARTHROPLASTY FOR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS SURGICAL CORRECTION: SUMMARY OF EVIDENCES.
Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In persistent and debilitating cases of spondylolisthesis, surgical correction is usually indicated, and the surgeon may opt for spinal fusion or dynamic stabilization techniques, such as lumbar facet arthroplasty (LFA). However, LFA is an emerging technique that requires more research to fully understand its effectiveness and safety. To summarize the scientific evidence related to LFA in the surgical correction of spondylolisthesis. The database chosen to papers selection was PUBMED, based on the following search string: ((lumbar[title/abstract] AND facet[title/abstract] AND arthroplasty[title/abstract]) OR tops[title /abstract]) AND spondylolisthesis[title/abstract], including studies published in the last 10 years. Results: Initially, 9 papers were identified that met the previously established search strategy. After reading the titles and abstracts, 1 text was excluded because it did not deal with the application of LFA in spondylolisthesis, leaving 8 studies for review. Significant clinical improvement, maintenance of radiological stability and low complication rates were consistently observed with the use of LFA. Furthermore, economic analyzes indicated that the TOPS System is a cost-effective and economically dominant option compared to conventional approaches such as TLIF. These findings suggest that the TOPS system may be a viable and advantageous alternative for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, offering not only clinical but also long-term economic benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.