ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
CLINICAL-EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF PATIENTS WITH CERVICALGIA AND THE IMPACT OF NUCLEAR RESONANCE.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with neck pain, assessing risk factors, comorbidities, and the need for therapeutic interventions, as well as the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on case management. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study involving 435 patients treated at the Emergency Department of the Instituto Ortopédico de Goiânia (IOG) between July and December 2023. Sociodemographic, clinical, and risk factor variables were analyzed based on data collected from electronic medical records. Statistical analysis included association tests with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Results: A high prevalence of sedentary lifestyle (94.59%) and prolonged work exposure (78.38%) was observed. Most patients required medication (94.59%), while 63.96% underwent additional clinical interventions. Statistically significant associations were identified between sex, occupational factors, and lesions detected by MRI. The average time to diagnosis was 4.2 months. Conclusion: Neck pain is strongly associated with modifiable risk factors such as sedentary behavior and occupational overload, highlighting the importance of preventive strategies and individualized therapeutic approaches. MRI played a key role in diagnosis and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.