Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837424›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

Applications of positive expiratory pressure in spontaneous breathing: why, when and how?

Monika Fagevik Olsén, Maria Sehlin, Jenny Danielsbacka, Malin Nygren-Bonnier, Anna Svensson-Raskh, Elisabeth Westerdahl, Louise Lannefors

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monika Fagevik OlsénDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0207-4105
Maria SehlinDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jenny DanielsbackaDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malin Nygren-BonnierDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Anna Svensson-RaskhDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Elisabeth WesterdahlUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Louise LanneforsDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spontaneously breathing patients, breathing exercises with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) can be used in various physiological ways to reopen closed airways by increasing the functional residual capacity (FRC) in hypoventilating patients, handle dyspnoea by decreasing the FRC, or reopen clogged airways and maintain an expiratory flow at low lung levels as part of airway clearance therapy. To make the most out of the treatment, the caregiver needs to know the pathophysiology and desired physiological effect of the treatment plan. This article presents the background of the application of PEP and gives information about frequently asked clinical questions. Based on this knowledge, individual prescriptions should be given to each patient including correct instruction and training on how to use PEP and how to adjust when the situation/condition changes. If daily long-term treatment is recommended, the patient needs regular return visits to monitor the effectiveness and evaluate it together with the patient, and to re-educate the patient as soon as needed.

Identifiers

PMID40837424
PMCPMC12362146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.