Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837400›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Comparative efficacy of eight traditional Chinese medicines combined with statins in the treatment of hyperlipidemia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Ling Jiang, Wen Fan, Fangyu Zhou, Lihan Liu, Maoxing Pan, Qinhe Yang, Yupei Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ling Jiang *School of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Wen Fan *School of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Fangyu ZhouSchool of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Lihan LiuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiangdong Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Liling, China.
Maoxing PanSchool of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Qinhe YangSchool of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yupei ZhangSchool of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hyperlipidemia drives global cardiovascular mortality by elevating risks of atherosclerosis and stroke. While statins are foundational, traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) are widely combined with statins to boost efficacy. However, diverse TCM formulations lack comparative evidence in combination regimens, necessitating urgent evidence-based optimization. Methods: Based on preliminary literature review and component usage frequency analysis, 8 TCMs were included firstly. Then, we conducted a systematic search for RCTs that assessed 8 TCMs with traditional statin drugs (TT) for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. The search was conducted through September 30, 2024, and encompassed China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Database of Chinese Sci-Tech Periodicals (VIP), Wanfang Database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes included clinical total effective rate, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Risk of bias in RCTs was evaluated using Cochrane's bias risk tool. Evidence synthesis was performed utilizing both direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA). Meta-regression analysis, subgroup analysis, publication bias analysis, and sensitivity analysis were employed to evaluate heterogeneity sources and efficacy robustness. Ranking analysis was implemented to comparatively assess clinical efficacy among eight TCMs. Evidence quality for each outcome was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach (GRADE). Overall, the proposed structured framework integrated high-frequency TCM screening, NMA-driven efficacy ranking, methodological validation, and mechanistic investigation to holistically evaluate therapeutic interventions for the first time. Results: 67 RCTs involving 7327 individuals and 8 TCMs were encompassed. Related analyses indicated TT + TCMs were more efficacious than TT monotherapy. Among 8 TCMs + TT, TT combined with Jiangzhi Tongmai Capsule (TT + JZTM) demonstrated the highest clinical total effective rate, TT combined with Dantian Jiangzhi Pill (TT + DTJZ) was the most effective in reducing TC, TT combined with Pushen Capsule (TT + PS) was the most effective in reducing TG, and TT combined with Jiangzhiling Tablet (TT + JZL) was the most effective in increasing HDL-C and reducing LDL-C. Conclusion: NMA revealed the overall clinical efficacy of TT + JZL, TT + DTJZ, and TT + JZTM were ranked at the forefront in treating hyperlipidemia. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for tailoring TCM-statin combinations to target individualized lipid profiles. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024603979, identifier [CRD42024603979].

Indexed as

clinical efficacyhyperlipidemianetwork meta-analysissafety outcometraditional Chinese medicines

Identifiers

PMID40837400
PMCPMC12361126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.