ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Chronic opioid prescription rates in older adults: A comparison of academic and nonacademic centers following long-segment lumbar instrumentation.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Factors influencing opioid prescribing include provider type, clinical experience, regional patterns, and institutional affiliation. This study compared the rates of chronic opioid prescriptions being given to older adults undergoing long-segment posterior lumbar fusions in academic versus nonacademic centers. Methods: Out of 20,719 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation involving 3-12 thoracolumbar levels (2010-2022), we created two matched groups that included 3,904 patients each. Patients were stratified according to whether they were treated in academic versus nonacademic centers. Matching included the utilization of 1:1 demographic and clinical factors and analyzed for opioid prescribing patterns at 3-6, 6-12, and 12-24 months postoperatively. Results: We found that patients operated on in nonacademic centers showed significantly lower odds of receiving codeine-based opioids at 3-6 and 6-12 months postoperatively. Conversely, at 12-24 postoperative months, these patients had increased odds of receiving noncodeine-based, strong, and moderate opioids versus academic center patients. Conclusion: For two cohorts of 3904 adults over 65 years of age undergoing 3-12 level thoracolumbar instrumented fusions, academic centers prescribed more opioids initially postoperatively, while nonacademic centers demonstrated higher long-term usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.