ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Long-term insights into brain abscess management: An 8-year study from a single center in India.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insertion of a Postoperative Drain After Surgeries for Intracranial Abscesses or Empyemas-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both industrialized and developing nations continue to face difficulties in diagnosing and treating brain abscesses. Their etiology and management are still complicated and uncertain, which make treatment and result challenging. Methods: To ascertain management, demographics, and factors influencing the outcome of subjects with brain abscesses, we performed a retrospective analysis of data from 48 individuals who underwent surgical treatment for brain abscesses at Mahatma Gandhi Hospital in Jaipur between January 2015 and December 2023 using image-guided aspiration, craniotomy, and excision. Independent analyses were conducted on variables such as age, gender, clinical presentation, location, number of lesions, predisposing factors, etiological agent, infection mechanism, therapy, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score during admission. Results: The risk of developing a brain abscess was higher for male patients over 40. The outcome was influenced by the admission GCS score. Only 16 instances (33.3%) had positive cultures, despite the low incidence of successful infectious agent culture. The most frequent isolates in these cases were Conclusion: An efficient treatment for brain abscesses that have generally positive results is medical care combined with image-guided suction. excision and craniotomy are rarely necessary. Neither surgical technique nor surgery was directly associated with brain abscess mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.