Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837307›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2025

Using clinical and radiographic variables to predict intracranial aneurysm rupture status with machine learning.

Mark D Johnson, Pradyumna Elavarthi, Seth Street, Samer S Hoz, Anca L Ralescu, Charles J Prestigiacomo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark D JohnsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Pradyumna ElavarthiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Seth StreetDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Samer S HozDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Anca L RalescuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Charles J PrestigiacomoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With excitement in the medical community around artificial intelligence, machine learning (ML) techniques have been applied to correlate clinical and radiographic variables with intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture status. In this study, we applied various ML techniques, including random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), support vector machines (SVM), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP), to predict IA rupture status. Methods: The dataset consisted of 178 IAs each with 53 clinical and radiographic features for analysis. We removed features with high correlation (>0.8) with respect to the target variable to reduce redundancy. We applied grid search to fine-tune the hyperparameters for each model. Each model was evaluated across five iterations of 5-fold cross-validation. Overall performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score) were extracted. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) scores between models. Results: The most common locations were internal carotid artery (42), anterior communicating artery (41), middle cerebral artery (32), and posterior communicating artery (25). The AUC for the RF (0.85) and XGB (0.76) models were significantly higher than those for the SVM (0.69) and MLP (0.65) models ( Conclusion: Among the models, RF achieved the highest accuracy (85%) with balanced precision and recall. Across models 3D geometric features drove model performance, highlighting the importance of these features in predicting rupture status.

Indexed as

AneurysmAngiographyMachine learningMorphologyShapeSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID40837307
PMCPMC12361647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.