ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
A case of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus without enlarged ventricle and with negative tap test.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is suspected by clinical symptoms and enlarged ventricles on imaging (Evans index [EI] >3.0). However, it remains unclear how to deal with patients who present with clinical symptoms but have no ventricular enlargement. Case Description: A 77-year-old man, whose symptoms were diagnosed as age-related (because of no ventriculomegaly and negative tap test) at a hospital visited 3 months prior, came to our clinic presenting with gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence (iNPH triad). His responses to questions were very slow, and his Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was 11/30. The patient was unable to stand up from his wheelchair without assistance and had difficulty in taking the first step. On examination, his EI was 0.26 and tap test was negative. However, iNPH was strongly suspected because imaging showed unclear cerebral sulci at the parietal level, a narrow callosal angle, and a disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space. Lumbar drainage was performed for 2 days, which improved his gait ability and increased his MMSE score to 17/30. We then performed shunt surgery. At 2 months after surgery, he was able to walk freely and independently around the hospital, his MMSE score improved to 25/30, and he was discharged home. Conclusion: Ventricle size is only an indicator for iNPH, and an EI cut-off of 0.3 is not an absolute indicator. Thus, even in the absence of ventricular enlargement, a thorough assessment is crucial in suspected iNPH cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.