ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Contrecoup raccoon sign following minor posterior head injury without visible injury: Diagnostic challenge in an asymptomatic older adult man.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic raccoon sign (periorbital ecchymosis) typically results from facial or severe head trauma involving anterior skull base fractures. In contrast, contrecoup raccoon signs arising from minor posterior head injuries are extremely rare, particularly in older adults. In addition, spontaneous, nontraumatic raccoon signs may be associated with focal or systemic conditions, including malignancies, necessitating extensive diagnostic evaluation. Distinguishing between traumatic and nontraumatic causes is crucial in older patients presenting with raccoon sign following minor head trauma, especially when neurological deficits and visible external injuries are absent. Case Description: An 85-year-old male with a 30-year history of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes presented with raccoon sign one morning, without additional symptoms. A comprehensive physical examination, including a detailed head assessment, revealed no abnormalities. However, computed tomography (CT) imaging identified a minor subarachnoid hemorrhage, and high-resolution CT imaging (1-mm bone slice thickness) detected a thin orbital roof fracture, confirming a traumatic contrecoup injury. This finding rendered the differential diagnosis for nontraumatic causes irrelevant. The patient's longstanding diabetes was considered a relevant factor in the development of the raccoon sign. Conclusion: In older adult patients presenting with raccoon sign but lacking overt symptoms, obtaining a thorough history of head trauma and diabetes is essential, even in cases of minor injury without visible external signs. High-resolution thin-slice bone CT imaging is vital for detecting subtle orbital roof fractures, which may otherwise go unnoticed. Early identification facilitates accurate diagnosis and prevents unnecessary evaluations for nontraumatic causes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.