Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Does digital collective learning improve with more participants? An experiment on a collective learning platform.

Santos Orejudo, Oscar Casanova, Jacobo Cano-Escoriaza, Ana Cebollero-Salinas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Santos OrejudoDepartment of Educational Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Oscar CasanovaDepartment of Educational Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jacobo Cano-EscoriazaDepartment of Educational Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ana Cebollero-SalinasDepartment of Educational Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The emergence of the Internet in the educational field has opened a significant number of possibilities, including interactive "virtual spaces" of collaboration in groups of many different sizes. Based on the principles of collective intelligence, our collaborative learning platform proposes an interaction model in which participants gradually reach solutions to a problem through a series of interaction processes that culminate in a step where consensus is reached. Methods: In our study, we compare results gathered from three groups of 11- to 12-year-old students (274, 56, and 69 participants) who dealt on the platform with a task related to emotional competencies in online environments. Large numbers of participants are possible on this platform thanks to its flexible design. Participants worked in seven phases to solve five questions with different answer formats based on a case study of social comparison on social networks. Results: Results reveal differences in terms of evolution according to group size: the largest group achieved the best results. Discussion: We analyzed the results through a series of variables that reveal further statistically significant differences among groups working on the same task in this novel learning environment.

Indexed as

collaborative learningcollective intelligencegroup sizeinteractionsocial networkssocioemotional competenciesspeech

Identifiers

PMID40837269
PMCPMC12363286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.