ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Influence of theoretical and practical artificial intelligence knowledge on the primary school teachers' sustainable AI integration ability: mediating effects of beliefs and attitudes.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of Artificial Intelligence to support administrative decision-making in special education institutions in Saudi Arabia: perceptions of principals, supervisors, and teachers.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a scale on the difficulties of AI technology integration in teaching for primary and secondary school teachers.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The critical-thinking paradox in generative AI-integrated learning: distinguishing efficiency from cognitive depth-a differentiated framework and testable propositions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- How does organizational AI adoption affect employees' job crafting behaviors? An approach-avoidance perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to be integrated into education to improve teaching and learning practices. However, the attainment of effective and sustainable AI tools usage in the primary education of the teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes is critical. This study examines the impact of theoretical and practical AI knowledge on the sustainable integration of AI in primary school classrooms, with a focus on the mediating role of teachers' beliefs and attitudes. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 340 primary school teachers in Northern Cyprus. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to test the relationships between AI knowledge, beliefs and attitudes and sustainable AI integration. Findings indicate that both theoretical and practical AI knowledge indirectly contribute to the integration of AI. Specifically, the beliefs and attitudes of teachers toward AI are a critical mediator that maintains the relationship. The results underscore the importance of training teachers to enhance their understanding of AI, cultivate positive attitudes, and boost their confidence in AI technologies. To offer better strategies that enhance the sustainable integration of AI in primary education, educational policymakers and institutions must consider these psychological factors that need to be addressed. This research contributes to the emerging body of work on AI in education, in general, and the interplay between knowledge, attitudes, and AI adoption, in particular, emphasizing the need for a holistic strategy toward teacher development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.