ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Latent classes of resilience in a nationwide sample of US adults during COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic represented a unique and widespread challenge that profoundly impacted the well-being of individuals across all age groups. This study aimed to identify the latent classes of resilience among a nationwide sample of US adults and characterize these classes according to their socio-demographic profiles. Methods: We conducted a survey of 3,340 US adults from March to June 2020 through Qualtrics panel participants, stratified demographically to represent the US population by gender, race, age, and geographic region. A latent class analysis was performed to identify distinct profiles of resilience based on emotions, behaviors, physical symptoms, coping resources, and social support. Results: Four latent classes of resilience were identified among US adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Low Mental/Physical Resilience (5.6%), Low Mental/Social Resilience (12.9%), Low Social Resilience (24.9%), and High Resilience (56.5%). The Low Mental/Physical Resilience class, which faced the highest mental risk, was notably distinguished by its members being younger, essential workers, and having children at home. Socially vulnerable groups, such as females and those with lower income, were more likely to be part of the Low Mental/Social Resilience and Low Social Resilience classes. Conclusion: Different groups of US adults may exhibit varying profiles of physical, mental, and social resilience during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings may help inform policies and interventions for mental health in future global health crises like COVID-19. During such crises, mental health support should be prioritized to essential workers and socially vulnerable groups, while accessible childcare services may particularly benefit parents who work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.