ArticleAdvanced photonics2024
Nested deep transfer learning for modeling of multilayer thin films.
Article in Advanced photonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart window films with ultra-broadband radiative regulation for all-season building energy saving.RSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning techniques have gained popularity in nanophotonics research, being applied to predict optical properties, and inversely design structures. However, one limitation is the cost of acquiring training data, as complex structures require time-consuming simulations. To address this, researchers have explored using transfer learning, where pre-trained networks can facilitate convergence with fewer data for related tasks, but application to more difficult tasks is still limited. In this work, a nested transfer learning approach is proposed, training models to predict structures of increasing complexity, with transfer between each model and few data used at each step. This allows modeling thin film stacks with higher optical complexity than previously reported. For the forward model, a bidirectional recurrent neural network is utilized, which excels in modeling sequential inputs. For the inverse model, a convolutional mixture density network is employed. In both cases, a relaxed choice of materials at each layer is introduced, making the approach more versatile. The final nested transfer models display high accuracy in retrieving complex arbitrary spectra and matching idealized spectra for specific applications-focused cases such as selective thermal emitters, while keeping data requirements modest. Our nested transfer learning approach represents a promising avenue for addressing data acquisition challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.