Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837210›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2025

Effectiveness, safety, and versatility of hyaluronic acid dermal filler in patients with reduced midface volume, chin retrusion, and/or loss of jawline contour: A prospective case series study with 12-month follow-up.

Vikram Swaminathan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vikram SwaminathanClinic Aesthetics, 10 Harley Street, Marylebone, London, W1G 9PF, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and versatility of injections with the same hyaluronic acid (HA) filler type in patients with signs of aging in the cheeks, chin, and/or jawline. Methods: In this single-arm, prospective case series study, patients aged ≥18 years with reduced midface volume, chin retrusion, and/or loss of jawline contour were administered HA filler (Y-Solution® 720 [20 mg/mL]) and followed through 12 months. Main outcomes included midface volume (Midface Volume Loss Rating Scale [MFVLRS]), chin retrusion (Chin Retrusion Rating Scale [CRRS]), loss of jawline contour (Jawline Contour Rating Scale [JCRS]), satisfaction (FACE-Q™ [1, worst; 4, best]), and safety. Results: Nineteen patients received a combined total of 33 treatments with HA filler (total volume: 67 mL). The 19 patients demonstrated an immediate improvement in MFVLRS, CRRS, and/or JCRS score from 1 to 3 at baseline to 0 to 1 immediately post baseline, which was maintained overall through 12 months (scores 0-3; no attendance, Conclusion: These results indicate that injections of the same HA filler reduced multiple signs of aging in the midface, chin, and/or jawline through 12 months; the injections also resulted in no significant adverse events, including swelling.

Indexed as

Case seriesCheekChinHyaluronic acidJawlineMidface

Identifiers

PMID40837210
PMCPMC12362359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.