ArticleJPRAS open2025
Paramedian open approach for gluteal biopolymers removal: a case series of 35 patients.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Various techniques have been described for biopolymer removal in the gluteal region. However, the literature lacks clear guidelines on the degree of gluteal involvement. This article aims to present a safe and reproducible open approach for biopolymer removal in patients with mild to moderate gluteal compromise. Methods: This case series includes 35 patients treated between January and March 2023 using a paramedian open approach for biopolymer removal in the gluteal region. All patients were classified as having mild to moderate involvement. The primary complications were analyzed to assess the safety and reproducibility of the procedure. Results: The majority of patients were classified as grade III (94.28 %). The most common complication was seroma (40 %), followed by wound dehiscence and infection. No cases of flap necrosis or hematoma were reported. The mean time for seroma formation was 31 days. A complication-free procedure was observed in 42.85 % of patients. Conclusions: This technique represents a safe alternative for the removal of biopolymers via an open approach in the gluteal area for patients with mild to moderate involvement. Although it is not a complication-free procedure, it yields favorable aesthetic outcomes, and the reported complications were effectively managed without requiring further interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.