ArticleAcademia biology2025
Biomechanical characteristics of frozen bone allografts after gene therapy-induced revascularization.
Article in Academia biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segmental bone loss reconstruction using frozen bone allografts has a great advantage over amputation. Unfortunately, frozen allografts are avascular, and their use often results in infection, non-union, or fracture. We have attempted to overcome these complications by revascularizing the bone using gene therapy. Segmental tibial bone transplants were performed in 16 Yucatan minipigs. An arteriovenous (AV) bundle was placed intramedullary inside the allografts, which were transfected with growth factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) in 8 out of the 16 pigs. Survival time was set at 20 weeks. Bone remodeling and biomechanical properties were tested using histology, compression testing, bone mineralization, and gait analysis. In the growth factor group, five out of eight pigs developed cutaneous vascular tumors, causing excessive bleeding, which led to the exclusion of one pig. Bone remodeling was significantly more present in the VEGF group compared to the control group. This correlated with the amount of pressure the pig allowed on the operated leg for 10 weeks, which was also significantly more (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.