ReviewHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2025
Preeclampsia prediction via machine learning: a systematic literature review.
Review in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting postpartum convulsions using clinical indicators from PMA Ethiopia data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Dynamic and Short-Term Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Routine Clinical Data.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Complement as a driver of immune-vascular heterogeneity across preeclampsia subtypes: toward a precision medicine framework.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia: a systematic review of machine learning models and clinical decision support systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Development and internal validation of the LATE-PE model for predicting time-to-delivery in early-onset preeclampsia: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Revolutionising health monitoring: IOT-Based system with machine learning classification.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia, a life-threatening condition in late pregnancy, has unclear causes and risk factors. Machine learning (ML) offers a promising approach for early prediction. This systematic review analyzes state-of-the-art studies on preeclampsia prediction using ML approaches. We reviewed articles published between January 1 2013 and December 31 2023, from Google Scholar and PubMed. Of 183 identified studies, 35 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our findings reveal that key predictive features commonly used in machine learning models include age, number of pregnancies, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, and blood pressure. In contrast, factors such as medications, genetic data, and clinical imaging were considered less frequently. Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes were the most commonly used algorithms. Most studies were conducted in China and the USA, indicating geographic concentration. The field has seen a notable rise in research, especially in the past two years, though many studies rely on small datasets from single hospitals. This review highlights the need for more diverse and comprehensive research to enhance early detection and management of preeclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.