Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40837108›Full record

ReviewHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2025

Preeclampsia prediction via machine learning: a systematic literature review.

Mert Özcan, Serhat Peker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mert ÖzcanDepartment of Management Information Systems, İzmir Bakırçay University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-1813
Serhat PekerDepartment of Management Information Systems, İzmir Bakırçay University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-3982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preeclampsia, a life-threatening condition in late pregnancy, has unclear causes and risk factors. Machine learning (ML) offers a promising approach for early prediction. This systematic review analyzes state-of-the-art studies on preeclampsia prediction using ML approaches. We reviewed articles published between January 1 2013 and December 31 2023, from Google Scholar and PubMed. Of 183 identified studies, 35 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our findings reveal that key predictive features commonly used in machine learning models include age, number of pregnancies, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, and blood pressure. In contrast, factors such as medications, genetic data, and clinical imaging were considered less frequently. Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes were the most commonly used algorithms. Most studies were conducted in China and the USA, indicating geographic concentration. The field has seen a notable rise in research, especially in the past two years, though many studies rely on small datasets from single hospitals. This review highlights the need for more diverse and comprehensive research to enhance early detection and management of preeclampsia.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningPreeclampsiapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40837108
PMCPMC12364110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.