SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Effects of exercise intervention on physical mobility in stroke patients: a scoping review and research progress.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Intensity Interval Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Cognitive Function, and Functional Capacity in Adults with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Exercise intervention improves the modified Barthel index, Berg balance scale, and Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper limb motor function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- An interpretable analysis of the depressive status and its influencing factors in elderly patients with stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to review the effects of exercise intervention on physical mobility in stroke patients and to explore its potential mechanisms in physical mobility in stroke. A scoping review of the literature was used to analyze the effects of relevant exercise interventions on the physical mobility of stroke patients. Results: Different exercise interventions significantly improves the physical mobility of stroke patients, and these interventions effectively improves muscle strength, motor coordination, balance, and psychological status. In addition, the exercise interventions are able to promote brain recovery by improving neuroplasticity and neurological function, which significantly improves the patients' ability to perform activities of daily living and independence. Conclusion: Exercise intervention is an effective treatment that can significantly improve the physical activity and quality of life of stroke patients during their rehabilitation. Future studies should further explore the optimal mode of exercise intervention, focus on the development of individualized treatment plans, and incorporate new technological aids to enhance the therapeutic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.