ArticleIn silico pharmacology2025
In silico discovery of alkaloids as VEGFR-2 inhibitors with favorable toxicity profiles: insights from molecular dynamics and MM/GBSA.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aberrant angiogenesis mediated by VEGFR-2 is a hallmark of aggressive cancers and a validated therapeutic target. Although clinical tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sorafenib have shown efficacy, their use is often limited by significant toxicity. In this study, we employed an integrated in silico approach to identify novel VEGFR-2 inhibitors among alkaloids from Brazilian biodiversity, aiming for high affinity and improved safety profiles. A curated library of alkaloids from the NuBBEDB was screened by molecular docking, and top candidates were subjected to a rigorous evaluation pipeline, including MM/GBSA rescoring, toxicity and ADME prediction, and in-depth post-dynamic analyses of 300 ns simulations, such as hydrogen bond analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). The alkaloids NuBBE_306 and NuBBE_456 emerged with strong binding affinities (ΔGbind = - 50.24 and - 47.37 kcal/mol, respectively) and favorable safety and ADME profiles compared to sorafenib. Crucially, the dynamic analyses revealed that NuBBE_456 stands out by maintaining a network of persistent hydrogen bonds and by mimicking the free energy landscape of sorafenib, stabilizing the same inhibited kinase conformation. These findings identify NuBBE_456 as an exceptional lead candidate, combining robust affinity, dynamic stability, and low predicted toxicity, warranting its prioritization for experimental validation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-025-00410-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.