ArticleMini-invasive surgery2025
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: experience at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Article in Mini-invasive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly used in the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. This is a report on the current technique of RAMIE at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), including a summary of early data on 65 patient outcomes reported in an ongoing esophageal cancer database. To date, we have performed over 200 cases of RAMIE at UPMC from September 2013 to July 2024, and the analysis of the data will be presented soon. The practice has evolved into a near-total RAMIE experience for several surgeons, while others remain in a learning curve. It is our experience that the initial performance of RAMIE requires strong mentoring by an experienced robotic surgeon. However, at this time, we are unable to provide guidelines for specific case numbers to achieve proficiency. As more patients with esophageal cancer are treated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) at UPMC, data have shown that patient outcomes are not compromised compared with that of traditional MIE. In fact, RAMIE may demonstrate superiority in the median number of lymph nodes harvested, which could contribute to increased accuracy in pathologic staging. This approach has developed a strong surgeon preference for both new graduates and experienced MIE surgeons alike.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.