Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Exploring the impact of compound retrieval strategy in the task-switching paradigm.

Fangyuan Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fangyuan ZhouSchool of Physical Education, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Task-switching costs are commonly used to measure cognitive control. However, previous research has shown that when participants are not explicitly instructed on task rules, they can adopt the compound retrieval strategy in task-switching paradigms with limited targets, where task-switching costs cannot reflect cognitive control. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether participants would spontaneously use the compound retrieval strategy when they are explicitly instructed on task rules. This study aimed to investigate this issue. Methods: In the experiment, 36 participants were recruited to complete two conditions: the four-target condition, in which only four targets were presented and repeated throughout the experiment, and the infinite-target condition, where targets were not repeated. Results: The results revealed that, compared to the infinite-target condition, task-switching costs were smaller, while response-congruency effects and the N2 difference wave (incongruent trials-congruent trials) were larger in the four-target condition. Discussion: These findings suggest that participants spontaneously use the compound retrieval strategy in the task-switching paradigm with limited targets.

Indexed as

compound retrieval strategyERPN2switch positivitytask-switching paradigm

Identifiers

PMID40836944
PMCPMC12362202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.