Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836943›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

TOPSS: TOlerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in Pediatric Stroke Survivors.

Stuart Fraser, Anna Clearman, Melika Abrahams, Bernadette Gillick, Tia Lal, Sean Savitz, Nuray Yozbatiran

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05812794 (TOlerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Stroke Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05812794 nacompletednot on this map

TOlerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Stroke Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2023 to 2024Enrolled5ConditionsChildhood StrokeArmsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stuart FraserDivision of Child and Adolescent Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.
Anna ClearmanDivision of Child and Adolescent Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.
Melika AbrahamsDivision of Child and Adolescent Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.
Bernadette GillickDivision of Developmental Pediatrics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Tia LalInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Sean SavitzInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Nuray YozbatiranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, NeuroRecovery Research Center at TIRR Memorial Hermann, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HOUSTON STROKE TRAINING PROGRAMT32NS007412 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SAVITZ, SEAN I · 1998 to 2023
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with emerging therapeutic potential in neurodevelopmental conditions. While childhood-onset stroke survivors frequently experience long-term motor impairment, there are very few studies examining the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in this population. Objective: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation paired with occupational therapy in children and adolescents with chronic hemiparesis following childhood-onset arterial ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label pilot study, five participants aged 6-19 years of age received five daily sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (sham on day 1, then 0.5-1.5 mA) during structured occupational therapy. Safety and tolerability were assessed through side effect questionnaires, pre-and post-stimulation vital signs, and study completion rates. Secondary exploratory outcomes included arm function measures (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity, perceived performance and satisfaction) (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure), and gross manual dexterity (Box and Blocks Test). Results: All participants completed the study with no major adverse events. Mild, self-limited itching or tingling occurred in 40% of sessions and did not limit participation. Four of five participants demonstrated clinically significant improvement on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity at 3-month follow up. Improvements were also observed in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and satisfaction scores. One participant with a prior craniectomy tolerated stimulation without adverse events. Conclusion: tDCS was well-tolerated in children and adolescents with chronic hemiparesis from childhood-onset stroke. These findings support the feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in this population and provide early-stage evidence to guide future randomized controlled trials exploring therapeutic applications of neuromodulation in childhood-onset stroke recovery. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05812794?term=AREA%5BBasicSearch%5D(pediatric%20stroke)&rank=10, ID: NCT05812794.

Indexed as

childhood strokeneuromodulationpediatric strokerehabilitationtDCS

Identifiers

PMID40836943
PMCPMC12362507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.