ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
A Lightweight Dual-Output Vision Transformer for Enhanced Lung Nodule Classification Using CT Images.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThis study evaluates the effectiveness of a lightweight vision transformer (EfficientFormerV2-S2) with a dual-output architecture for lung nodule classification, assessing its performance and generalizability across multiple datasets.MethodsThe study utilized datasets from three sources: Institution 1 (936 images), Institution 2 (280 images), and a public Zenodo dataset (308 images), comprising adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and benign lesions. Model evaluation included holdout validation, five-fold cross-validation, and benchmarking against the PneumoniaMedMNIST dataset. Comprehensive image preprocessing and augmentation techniques were implemented.ResultsThe model demonstrated robust performance across all datasets, achieving test accuracies of 92.62 ± 1.65%, 97.14 ± 1.78%, and 95.74 ± 1.35% for Institutions 1, 2, and Zenodo respectively. Cross-validation results showed consistent performance with minimal variability (standard deviations <2%). On the PneumoniaMedMNIST benchmark, our optimized model achieved superior performance (accuracy: 0.936, AUC: 0.981) compared to ResNet18 and ResNet50 benchmarks.ConclusionThe lightweight transformer-based model demonstrates excellent performance and generalizability across multiple institutional datasets, suggesting its potential for efficient clinical implementation in lung nodule classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.